mightydoll: (Default)
[personal profile] mightydoll
So, my son is in grade six now, and so begins the part of social studies I hate the most: current events.

Now, lest you think I'm preferring to be an ostrich with my head in the sand, I do think it's important for good citizens to know what's going on in their world. My problem is with the approach to current events that has always been curriculum approved.

Buy a newspaper (they can now use an accepted internet news source), regurgitate what the newspaper is telling you for your classmates. Make sure you parrot all the talking points, but in your own words, to show you've understood.

How does parroting show you've understood, exactly? That isn't current events, that's reading comprehension, and the LAST thing I want my kid to sit through is days of 11 year olds parroting what our media sources have to say about current events.

Take for example the news coverage of Roman Polanski's recent arrest (which my son might actually cover, since we had a long talk about it last night). By the news reports, what an 11 year old will take away is that a wealthy, powerful, man used his influence and power to rape have sex with a young girl (no mention of the fact that there are SIX counts on that record, by the way - no mention that he did so repeatedly). However, this man shouldn't be held accountable because he had a hard life (Auschwitz, the murder of his pregnant wife) and he makes great movies (which he's continued to be celebrated for) In every article I've seen, the government is wrong, wrong, WRONG to arrest him on his way to an awards ceremony, and the fact that he RAPED A LITTLE GIRL, a child barely older than the kids in my son's class, is downplayed, barely mentioned, or written off as a spot of bother way back in the 70's (a time which, to an 11 year old, probably sounds like pre-history). Rape aplogism at its height.

The thing is, all newspapers are like this, they ALL have a tilt, and kids aren't expected to comment on the stories, they aren't expected to go to several sources for the stories (they're too young for in depth research, I assume - I'd certainly have issues with age-appropriateness if they were expected to do that level of research, in addition to all their other homework - which is significant) and they aren't taught how to look at them objectively (they are taught that about advertising, but there's very much the idea that reliable news sources are reliable).

I remember trying to bring my own questioning of news stories into the classroom in grades 6-10. Each time I was told I was meant to regurgitate, not comment. I was lectured on my own "journalistic integrity", ignoring the journalistic integrity of the articles themselves. I was meant to be a "reporter" not to give an editorial.

I would like to see what happens if my son gives an editorial, but I don't have high hopes that it'll effect his grade in a positive manner.

Thoughts? Suggestions? Dis/agreements? I welcome feedback on this one, cuz I'm struggling with coming to grips with it.
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


mightydoll: (Default)

February 2010

789 10111213

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 19th, 2017 05:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios